Module overview
Aims and Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge and Understanding
Having successfully completed this module, you will be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:
- Identify the organisational, logistic and managerial processes necessary to ensure successful fieldwork
- Define the strategies, procedures and techniques of excavation and recording in the intertidal zone and underwater
- Undertake post- fieldwork data processing, including object recording
- Demonstrate a detailed knowledge of specific case studies.
- Explain the ethical frameworks within which responsible maritime archaeological fieldwork is carried out
Subject Specific Practical Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Evaluate a maritime site and design a survey strategy
- Undertake independent research in the above areas in the execution of a field survey
- Apply a variety of survey methods including data collection and processing
- Identify appropriate methodologies matched to site type, materials and condition
- Produce plans and other forms of output with the data from the above techniques
Transferable and Generic Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Plan, design and implement data collection and presentation.
- Produce academic/commercial standard reports and presentations
- Evaluate different research strategies
- Learn and apply new practical and theoretical skills
Syllabus
Learning and Teaching
Teaching and learning methods
Type | Hours |
---|---|
Lecture | 36 |
Preparation for scheduled sessions | 10 |
Completion of assessment task | 50 |
Follow-up work | 10 |
Wider reading or practice | 20 |
Practical classes and workshops | 14 |
Demonstration | 10 |
Total study time | 150 |
Resources & Reading list
Internet Resources
Journal Articles
Tomalin, D., Simpson, P. & Bingeman, J. M. (2000). Excavation versus sustainability in situ: a conclusion on 25 years of archaeological investigations at Goose Rock, a designated historic wreck-site at the Needles, Isle of Wight, England. IJNA, 29(1), pp. 3--42.
Singh, H., Adams, J., Mindell, D. & Foley, B. (2000). Imaging Underwater for Archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology, 27(3), pp. 319-328.
Firth, A (1993). The Management of Archaeology Underwater. Archaeological resource management in the UK: An Introduction.
Ferrari, B. & Adams, J. (1990). Biogenic modification of marine sediments and their influence on archaeological material. IJNA, 19(2), pp. 139-151.
Adams, J. (2002). Excavation methods under water. Encyclopaedia of Historical Archaeology, pp. 192-196.
Foley, B., Adams, J., Piechota, D., Giangrande, C. (2000). The Discoveries of ancient history in the deep sea using advanced deep submergence technology. Deep-Sea Research, 1, pp. 1591-1620.
Bingham, B., Mindell, D., Wilcox, T & A. Bowen (2006). Integrating precision relative positioning into JASON/MEDEA ROV operations. Marine Technology Society (MTS) Journal, 40(1), pp. 87-96.
Textbooks
Joint Nautical Archaeology Policy Committee (1993). Still at Sea.
Ransley, J., Sturt, F., Dix, J.K., Adams, J. & Blue, L. (2013). People and the Sea. A Maritime Archaeological Research Agenda for England. York: English Heritage/Council for British Archaeology.
Joint Nautical Archaeology Policy Committee (1989). Heritage at Sea: Proposals for the Better Protection of Archaeological Sites Underwater. London: JNAPC/National Maritime Museum.
Bowens, A. (ed.) (2008). Underwater Archaeology: The NAS Guide to Principles and Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Muckelroy, K (1978). Maritime Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adams, J. (2013). A Maritime Archaeology of Ships. Innovation and Social Change in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Joint Nautical Archaeology Policy Committee (1998). Code of Practice for Seabed Developers.. int Nautical Archaeology Policy Committee/RCHME.
Green, J. (2009). Maritime Archaeology, a Technical Handbook. London: Academic Press.
Assessment
Assessment strategy
Informal feedback will provided throughout the module via lectures, practicals, seminars, workshops and tutor supervision. Detailed and constructive written feedback will be given for all assignments submitted. The module assessment revolves around the application of maritime archaeological thinking and techniques, to real-world situations. Students will select five portfolio outputs from a given list (example below), and complete the tasks required over the duration of the course. The portfolio tasks will comprise a mixture of written and practical elements to demonstrate analysis, and the application of techniques. Some of the tasks will be based upon field trips to appraise archaeological sites, while others will be based on objects/artefacts held within the archaeology department. Where practical, diving work will be included in a manner that assesses archaeological output, not diving technique.Summative
This is how we’ll formally assess what you have learned in this module.
Method | Percentage contribution |
---|---|
Group presentation | 40% |
Report | 60% |
Referral
This is how we’ll assess you if you don’t meet the criteria to pass this module.
Method | Percentage contribution |
---|---|
Presentation (Case study) | 40% |
Report | 60% |
Repeat
An internal repeat is where you take all of your modules again, including any you passed. An external repeat is where you only re-take the modules you failed.
Method | Percentage contribution |
---|---|
Report | 60% |
Presentation (Case study) | 40% |
Repeat Information
Repeat type: Internal & External