Module overview
Aims and Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge and Understanding
Having successfully completed this module, you will be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:
- Critically evaluate examples of ‘evidence’ from literature and practice
- The need to consider and reflect on inequality in psychological research and whose voices are represented.
- Articulate the role(s) of EBP in educational psychology and the role(s) of educational psychology in EBP; the pathways via which evidence is built, amassed and progressed.
- Explain what is meant by ‘evidence’, and differentiate and categorize the quality of different types of ‘evidence’.
- Analyse the strengths and limitations of different types of ‘evidence'.
- Respond critically to arguments against the principles of EBP.
Syllabus
Learning and Teaching
Teaching and learning methods
| Type | Hours |
|---|---|
| Teaching | 29 |
| Independent Study | 21 |
| Total study time | 50 |
Resources & Reading list
Journal Articles
Roberts, S.O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins. F.A., Goldie, P.D. & Mortenson, E. (2020). Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future.. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), pp. 1295-1309.
APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology.. The American Psychologist, 61(4), pp. 271.
Burnham, S. (2013). Realists or pragmatists? “Reliable evidence” and the role of the educational psychologist.. Educational Psychology in Practice, 29(1), pp. 19–35.
Fox, M. (2011). Practice-based evidence – overcoming insecure attachments. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27(4), pp. 325–335.
Textbooks
Frederickson, N. (2002). Evidence-based practice and educational psychology Educational and Child Psychology. Vol 19(3), 2002, 96-111.
Kelly, B. & Perkins, D. (2004). Handbook of Implementation Science for Psychology in Education.
Kratochwill, T. & Shernoff, E. (2003). Evidence-Based Practice: Promoting Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology. WCER Working Paper No. 2003-13.
Assessment
Assessment strategy
Trainees will be expected to write a critique of an assigned article.Formative
This is how we’ll give you feedback as you are learning. It is not a formal test or exam.
Presentation
- Assessment Type: Formative
- Feedback: Verbal feedback, to presented material, will include in vivo response (questions, debate) by peers and staff
- Final Assessment: No
- Group Work: Yes
Summative
This is how we’ll formally assess what you have learned in this module.
| Method | Percentage contribution |
|---|---|
| Critical review | 100% |
Referral
This is how we’ll assess you if you don’t meet the criteria to pass this module.
| Method | Percentage contribution |
|---|---|
| Critical review | 100% |
Repeat Information
Repeat type: Internal