Module overview
Aims and Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Subject Specific Intellectual and Research Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Explain the contemporary and historical empirical dynamics of European security governance and relate them to theoretical debates.
Knowledge and Understanding
Having successfully completed this module, you will be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:
- Identify key theoretical debates and institutional aspects of European security governance, as well as key problems on the contemporary European security agenda.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the current structures of European security governance based on how well they are suited for addressing contemporary security problems.
Transferable and Generic Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Apply the knowledge of institutions involved in European security governance to devise strategies for addressing contemporary security problems.
Syllabus
Learning and Teaching
Teaching and learning methods
Type | Hours |
---|---|
Guided independent study | 24 |
Tutorial | 6 |
Independent Study | 100 |
Blended Learning | 24 |
Total study time | 154 |
Resources & Reading list
Textbooks
Webber, Mark, Stuart Croft, Jolyon Howorth, Terry Terriff and Elke Krahmann (2004). The Governance of European Security’, Review of International Studies.
Daase, Christopher and Cornelius Friesendorf (2010). Rethinking Security Governance: the Problem of Unintended Consequences. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wagnsson, Charlotte, James A. Sperling and Jan Hallenberg (2009). uropean Security Governance: the European Union in a Westphalian world. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zwolski, K. (2012). ‘The EU and a Holistic Security Approach after Lisbon: Competing Norms and the Power of the Dominant Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 19.
Kirchner, Emil J. and Dominiguez, Roberto (2011). The Security Governance of International Organizations. Abingdon: Routledge.
Gänzle S. and Sens, A. (2007). The Changing Politics of European Security: Europe Alone?. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kaunert, C. and Zwolski, K. (2013). The European Union as a Global Security Actor: A Comprehensive Analysis beyond CFSP and JHA.. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kirchner, Emil J. and James Sperling (2007). Global Security Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.
Toje, Asle (2010). The European union as a small power. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kurowska, Xymena (2011). Explaining the EU's common security and defence policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kavalski, Emilian (2008). Extending the European Security Community; constructing peace in the Balkans. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hoffmann, Matthew J. and Alice D. Ba (2005). Contending Perspectives on Global Governance: coherence, contestation and world order. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zwolski, K. & Kaunert, C. (2011). The EU and Climate Security: A Case of Successful Norm Entrepreneurship?' European Security Vol 20.
Zwolski, K. (2011). ‘Unrecognised and Unwelcome? The Role of the EU in Preventing the Proliferation of CBRN Weapons, Materials and Knowledge’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, vol. 12.
Schroeder, Ursula C (2011). The Organization of European Security: internal and external security in transition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zwolski, K. (2011). ‘The External Dimension of the EU’s Non-proliferation Policy: Overcoming Inter-institutional Competition’, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 16.
Ginsberg, Roy H (2012). The European Union in global security; The politics of impact. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Krahmann, Elke (2003). ‘Conceptualizing Security Governance’, Cooperation and Conflict.
Wilkinson, Rorden (2005). The Global Governance Reader. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zwolski, K. (2012). ‘The EU as an International Security Actor after Lisbon: Finally a Green Light for a Holistic Approach?’, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 47.
Assessment
Summative
This is how we’ll formally assess what you have learned in this module.
Method | Percentage contribution |
---|---|
Policy Brief Report | 50% |
Essay | 50% |
Referral
This is how we’ll assess you if you don’t meet the criteria to pass this module.
Method | Percentage contribution |
---|---|
Essay | 100% |
Repeat
An internal repeat is where you take all of your modules again, including any you passed. An external repeat is where you only re-take the modules you failed.
Method | Percentage contribution |
---|---|
Essay | 50% |
Policy Brief Report | 50% |
Repeat Information
Repeat type: Internal & External