Module overview
Aims and Objectives
Learning Outcomes
Full CEng Programme Level Learning Outcomes
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- The selection of appropriate design solutions requires groups to apply both computational and analytical techniques to model complex engineering problems. This is assessed summatively through a combination of group and individual reports and formatively through weekly supervisory meetings, the interim review and research group presentations.
- Each student's self-learning and development is recorded as part of the summatively assessed individual report and formatively supported by the monthly design journal entries and supervisory meetings.
- Each group must effectively communicate complex engineering matters to both technical and non-technical audiences as part of the summatively assessed report, presentation and video. This is supported formatively through research group presentations and interim reviews after which students can reflect upon the effectiveness of the methods used.
- Students identify, evaluate and mitigate risks throughout the design process with these being recorded and summatively assessed within the individual and group reports. This is supported formatively by the identification, evaluation and mitigation of risk within weekly supervisory meetings.
- Students adopt an inclusive approach to the development of their design solutions recognising the responsibilities, benefits and importance of supporting equality, diversity and inclusion. This is assessed via the group report.
- Students apply knowledge of engineering management principles throughout their project. This is assessed formatively at the interim review and during supervisory meetings and summatively via the group report.
- Each group project requires students to engage with and evaluate the relevant technical literature to inform their decision-making around, for example, the choice of computational, analytical or perhaps experimental methods to solve complex design problems. This is assessed summatively through a combination of group and individual reports and formatively through weekly supervisory meetings, the interim review and research group presentations.
- The originality of the group's design solution combined with how well it meets the societal, user, business and customer needs including the consideration of health safety, diversity, inclusion, cultural, societal, environmental and commercial matters is assessed within the group report, video and presentation and individual report.
- In the development of their design solutions, all groups select and apply appropriate materials, equipment, engineering technologies and processes. This is summatively assessed as part of both the group and individual reports.
- Students identify and analyse the ethical aspects of their design brief and selected design solutions and this is assessed summatively within the group and individual reports.
- Groups are presented with open-ended design problems and are required to formulate and analyse these problems using mathematics, statistics and engineering principles in order to inform the design decisions that they make. This is assessed summatively through a combination of group and individual reports and formatively through weekly supervisory meetings, the interim review and research group presentations.
- Adopt a holistic and proportionate approach to the mitigation of security risks
- The environmental and societal impact of proposed design solutions are considered by each group as part of their design process. This is assessed as part of the group and individual reports.
- An integrated or systems approach is required as part of the solution of the design brief provided to each group. This is assessed through the summative group outputs (report and presentation) and supported through formative feedback as part of regular supervisory meetings and presentations.
- Students reflect on the effectiveness of both their own and the team's performance as part of the summative individual report. This reflection is assessed formatively as part of the monthly student design journals.
- Students apply comprehensive knowledge of mathematics, statistics, natural science and engineering principles developed through their four years of study to the design of a complex engineering problem proposed by staff within the school. Each project proposal tackles a problem at the forefront of engineering, in line with our philosophy as a research-led institution. This is assessed summatively through a combination of group and individual outputs (reports, presentation video) and formatively through weekly supervisory meetings, the interim review and research group presentations.
Subject Specific Intellectual and Research Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Locate, read, understand and review research papers and be able to describe different research and methodological approaches across disciplines
- Evaluate critically your strategy, processes and output
- Design a component, system or process using appropriate design techniques and be able to describe key elements of those processes
- Generate ideas related to designing new or appropriate solutions, systems, components or processes
- Research information related to a design solution and discuss within the group
- Describe any commercial risks [as appropriate]
- Assess the social, economic, political, legislative, environmental, cultural, ethical, technical, environmental and commercial aspects of the problem to be solved in order to develop a comprehensive project brief
- Apply appropriate quantitative science and engineering tools to the analysis of unfamiliar problems
- Coordinate a creative and innovative design solution with the effective use of appropriate design methodologies
- Gather and synthesise data, contextualise your results, recommend further work, or how work could have been improved
Subject Specific Practical Skills
Having successfully completed this module you will be able to:
- Establish a project plan that is efficient and recognises group strengths and the time frame
- Demonstrate independence as a learner
- Monitor the progress of your design and the project outcomes
- Locate, read, understand and review research papers
- Communicate both orally and in writing
- Record discussions at supervisory and peer based meetings in such a way that they can be effectively referred to in the future
- Plan and meet your own deadlines
- Prioritise competing demands
- Manage your time
- Use (if appropriate) computer based engineering tools and modelling to solve problems
- Reflect on group processes and own role in team work
Syllabus
Learning and Teaching
Teaching and learning methods
Type | Hours |
---|---|
Independent Study | 190 |
Teaching | 20 |
Total study time | 210 |
Resources & Reading list
General Resources
Potential resources. The projects within this module are diverse and are supported by a wide range of potential resources, including the Design Studio and Workshop, time allocated within specialist laboratories and testing facilities, and specialist software. Each project group is allocated a budget which can be spent to support the project (e.g. materials for manufacture, travel), as well as time within our Engineering Workshop for the production of professionally manufactured components. Some projects may have additional sponsorship from the industry. You will be given a budget that you must manage to deliver your design to cost. Each project qualifies for funding at a level determined by the core project funding and the number of students in each group. Funds will cover the costs of travel expenses, materials and hospitality for project sponsors. This budget per GDP is, RM 1000 plus RM 100 per student. Each group should appoint a treasurer who is responsible for ensuring that the budget is properly managed. Teams who exceed their budget will be expected to settle the difference personally. With the exception of funds awarded via a successful bid to the elevator pitch, no additional Faculty funding will be available, except in extreme and unavoidable circumstances.
Assessment
Assessment strategy
There is no referral option for this core module. Students failing this GDP will be required to take an internal repeat year.Summative
This is how we’ll formally assess what you have learned in this module.
Method | Percentage contribution |
---|---|
Group Output | 100% |
Repeat Information
Repeat type: Internal