"...Stevan Harnad is into the second decade of his jeremiad on
the subject of self-archiving. A number of platforms have been
created to support institutional repositories... If librarians and
academicians agree on the desirability of institutional repositories,
and software platforms and services are available to make repositories
technically feasible, one is left to ponder a few questions. Why are
there so few institutional repositories up and running? Why are the
existing institutional repositories generally not well filled with
the intellectual output of their respective institutions?..."
J1:6 Only (institutional and funder) self-archiving mandates provide the necessary
and sufficient conditions for setting self-archiving inexorably
on the path to 100% OA -- yet that's precisely what George
Porter fails even to mention!.
See Book of Ruth:
http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11006/
J1:8 Only the empirical example of those institutions and funders that already
mandate self-archiving -- and have thus demonstrated both
the feasibility and the success of mandated self-archiving --
will generate self-archiving mandates. And self-archiving. And
100% OA.
http://www.eprints.org/signup/fulllist.php
Amen.
</jeremiad>
Dixit
Received on Sun Aug 20 2006 - 05:32:29 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:48:28 GMT