Figure 5.9 shows a phase diagram of remanent
magnetisation states for systems simulated with magpar where
the height increases from
to
in
steps and
varies between 12.5nm and 125nm.
![]()
|
We observe three distinct reversal mechanisms. Taking =50nm, for
the reversal is coherent; all the magnetic moments remain
aligned and rotate homogeneously. Between
and
an
out-of-plane vortex forms with a core perpendicular to the applied
field after some initial energy barrier is overcome and this can
freely move around the inside of the part-sphere with the applied
field. This is similar to the behaviour seen in cylindrical particles
shown in figures 3.3 to 3.8 and in other
works (Boardman et al., 2004, Ha et al., 2003, Cowburn et al., 1999b, Li et al., 2002). We will
now discuss the reversal mechanism in more detail.
Figure 5.10 shows the perpendicular vortex reversal
behaviour. Point A shows the homogeneously aligned state at high
applied field, though there is a small C-state-like shift in the
-
direction at the extremities in order to minimise dipolar
energy. At point B there is a shift into an S-like state in the
-
direction, where the magnetic moments at the edges of the
half-sphere persist in the applied field direction while the moments
towards the centre are aligned a few degrees away from the
direction into the
direction. Reducing the field further overcomes
an energy barrier and a perpendicular (i.e. the core of the
vortex points in the
direction) vortex is formed. Point C shows
the remanent state of the half-sphere with this vortex in the centre;
the net magnetisation in the
direction is now zero. Point D shows
the effects of a continued field reduction; the vortex has shifted
further into the
direction appropriate for allowing the majority
of the magnetic moments to point in the negative
direction.
Finally, at point E the external field is now sufficiently low to
remove the vortex from the system, and a homogeneously aligned state
remains.
Figure 5.11 shows the reversal mechanism with an
in-plane vortex for a sphere (i.e. ). Although the
size and material differ from the sphere in section 3.5,
there is a qualitative similarity we will review. Point A shows a
homogeneous alignment of the magnetic moments in the
direction,
which persists until point B, where the field has been lowered enough
to overcome the energy barrier and allow an in-plane (i.e.
where the core points in the
direction) vortex to form; this also
allows the majority of the magnetisation to continue pointing in the
direction.
As the field is further reduced, the component of
the magnetisation outside the vortex core continues to follow the
applied field; however the core remains pointing wholly in the
direction of the initial applied field. At point C, after the field is
reduced below zero the core of the vortex flips over, which is
responsible for the ``minor'' hysteresis loop around
. The vortex can exit the system when the field is
further reduced and the magnetisation becomes homogeneous (point D).
![]() |
Our simulation results agree with the computation of the critical
radius
(O'Handley, 1999, p305) of single-domain to vortex state
transition (equation 3.1) for NiFe
permalloy in
spheres of radius 12.4nm (
=24.8nm): a single-domain remanent state
is observed in our simulations of spheres of diameter 24nm and below
where the exchange energy is dominant, whilst an in-plane vortex is in
the remanent state when the diameter is 25nm or greater as the dipolar
energy becomes preponderant.