Can there be an algorithm for creativity?
An initial reaction would be to say that it is not possible to have an
algorithm for intellectual creativity. (Artistic creativity may be
treated as a totally different concept because a computer program
(which is an algorithm) can be written that will enable a machine to
draw a picture - this is not the type of creativity discussed here.)
The reason for this gut reaction is because it would require a method
of procedure that is guaranteed to eventually lead to creativity. The
possible criteria for which may be seen to be something that is
relatively valuable when measured against what already exists and is
unexpected. If something is unexpected how can an algorithm be
guaranteed to find a solution for it?
Many of the factors discussed as not being creative may be produced by
an algorithm, e.g. problem solving, learning, deduction and imitation.
These have known boundaries and the capacity for repetition. The rarity
of creativity makes it difficult to fulfil this criteria. However, once
the limits of the necessary algorithms have been exceeded then the
scope is there for creativity to exist, thereby suggesting that
creativity can override the initial enforced limitations.
The one essential ingredient for creativity appears to be preparation,
i.e. previously learnt knowledge and skills which then maximise the
potential for creativity through chance. Presumably, this criteria
could be provided by an algorithm but would only provide the
foundations for creativity; the apparent ingredient of chance cannot be
produced by an algorithm.
I would conclude, therefore, that there cannot be an algorithm for
creativity although the case is not as clear cut as initially thought.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Feb 13 2001 - 16:23:43 GMT