> From: "Lee, Liz" <EAL195@psy.soton.ac.uk>
> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 09:06:16 GMT
>
> jd> can machines be described by saying that A Machine Is Any Known Object
> jd> That Has A Specific Use And/Or Objective?
>
> Isn't this splitting the mind and body again? There are many "uses" the
> human machine can be put to, this doesn't really tell us what the mind
> does or is for does it? If, to use Stevan's example , you think of a
> slave working for his master, this is just one machine directing the
> physical labour of another; it doesn't make the real question any
> clearer. There is no" specific use or objective" for the human machine,
> after all, not everyone reproduces so that can't be it. Beats me what a
> machine is! Liz
Then you should be prepared to confess that if you were to say "people
are not machines" you would not be affirming or denying anything at
all!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Feb 13 2001 - 16:23:38 GMT