Against Squandering Scarce Library Funds on Pre-Emptive Gold OA Without First Mandating Green OA
It is beyond my powers of comprehension to fathom why Cornell
University would want to throw $50K of scarce library funds at
funding Gold OA publication (for at most 0.1% of Cornell's annual
journal article output) without first mandating Green OA (for the
remaining 99.9% of Cornell's annual journal article output) at no
cost at all.
(Yes, $50K is a pittance compared to $18M library budget, but wasn't
this supposed to be about providing OA to Cornell's research output?)
Stevan Harnad
American Scientist Open Access Forum
Against Squandering Scarce Research Funds on Pre-Emptive
Gold OA... 15 May 2009
Pre-Emptive Gold Fever Strikes Again... 23 Apr 2009
On Throwing Money At Gold OA Without First Mandating
Green OA 28 Mar 2009
University of California: Throwing Money At Gold OA
Without 8 Mar 2009
Conflicts of Interest in Open Access... 1 May 2009
Green OA is no threat to grants: Pre-emptive Gold OA,
today, might 24 Jan 2007
More OA Somnambulism: Conflating the Journal
Affordability and... 5 Mar 2009
SCOAP3 and the pre-emptive "flip" model for Gold OA
conversion 23 Jun 2008
Harvard's Stuart Shieber on Open Access at CalTech and
Berkeley... 17 Apr 2009
Publisher anti-OA Lobby Triumphs in European
Commission... 13 Jul 2007
Physics World: The CERN Gold OA Initiative 8 Mar 2007
On "Open Access" Publishers Who Oppose Open Access
Self-Archiving 3 Mar 2007
Gold and Green Keynotes at IATUL 2007 11 Jun 2007
Cliff Lynch on Open Access 12 Jan 2007
Journal Affordability, Research Accessibility, and Open
Access 14 Jun 2008
Clarifying the Logic of Open Choice: I (of 2) 23 Mar 2007
OA Primer for the Perplexed: I 25 May 2008
Critique of EPS/RIN/RCUK/DTI "Evidence-Based Analysis of
Data..." 8 Oct 2006
Received on Tue May 26 2009 - 18:33:06 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:46 GMT