[ The following text is in the "windows-1252" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
2009/2/15 Stevan Harnad <amsciforum_at_gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Sally Morris (Morris Associates)
> <sally_at_morris-assocs.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> The first step of the 'three step test' is important ? the use has to be a
>> 'special case' (i.e. not systematic)
>
> The "non-systematicity" is in the author's individual, case-by-case decision
> as to whether or not to fulfill each individual would-be user's eprint
> request,
Your Request-button-ideology is based on pure arbitrariness. If the
author only has the mail adress of the requester and no university
affiliation - what are the criteria to decide? Random? Or simply NO -
the most scholars in my several tests have'nt reacted on my request
button tests.
As I have shown at
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5193609/
the Request button isn't legal in Germany.
Klaus Graf
Received on Sun Feb 15 2009 - 17:14:34 GMT