Re: Call for a vote of nonconfidence in the moderator of the AmSci Forum

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Bill Hooker <cwhooker_at_FASTMAIL.FM>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 00:32:06 -0400

Such a vote seems unnecessary to me, but if one is to be (is being?) held
then I wish to make it clear that I vote to retain Stevan Harnad as moderator.
Received on Wed Oct 08 2008 - 10:34:24 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bill Hooker: "Re: New ways of measuring research"
Previous message: Alma Swan: "Re: New ways of measuring research"
Maybe in reply to: Stevan Harnad: "Re: Call for a vote of nonconfidence in the moderator of the AmSci Forum"
Next in thread: David Dickson: "Re: Call for a vote of nonconfidence in the moderator of the AmSci Forum"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:31 GMT