Australian innovation report recommends Open Access to research outputs
[ The following text is in the "WINDOWS-1252" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
The Australian minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and
Research, Kim Carr spoke about this report in a speech released
yesterday. Full text here.
It is embodied in a series of recommendations aimed at
unlocking public information and content, including the
results of publicly funded research.
The review panel recommends making this material
available under a creative commons licence through:
machine searchable repositories, especially
for scientific papers and data
and the internet, where it would be freely
available to the world.
...The arguments for stepping out first on
open access are the same as the arguments for
stepping out first on emissions trading ? the
more willing we are to show leadership on
this, we more chance we have of persuading
other countries to reciprocate.
This speech reflects a number of
recommendations in the report:
Recommendation 7.7: Australia should
establish a National Information Strategy to
optimise the flow of information in the
Australian economy. The fundamental aim of a
National Information Strategy should be to:
·utilise the principles of targeted
transparency and the development of auditable
standards to maximise the flow of information
in private markets about product quality; and
·maximise the flow of government generated
information, research, and content for the
benefit of users (including private sector
resellers of information).
Recommendation 7.8: Australian governments
should adopt international standards of open
publishing as far as possible. Material
released for public information by Australian
governments should be released under a
creative commons licence.
Recommendation 7.9: Funding models and
institutional mandates should recognise the
research and innovation role and
contributions of cultural agencies and
institutions responsible for information
repositories, physical collections or
creative content and fund them accordingly.
Recommendation 7.10: A specific strategy for
ensuring the scientific knowledge produced in
Australia is placed in machine searchable
repositories be developed and implemented
using public funding agencies and
universities as drivers.
Recommendation 7.14: To the maximum extent
practicable, information, research and
content funded by Australian governments
including national collections should be made
freely available over the internet as part of
the global public commons. This should be
done whilst the Australian Government
encourages other countries to reciprocate by
making their own contributions to the global
digital pubic commons.
____________________________________________________________________________
As ROARMAP indicates, the world leader in Open Access, both in time
and in absolute size, is indisputably the United Kingdom: A UK
Parliamentary Select Committee was the world's first governmental
recommendation to mandate OA, in 2004. However, the UK government,
under pressure from the publishing lobby, did not accept its own
committee's recommendation. Nevertheless, six of the
seven RCUK research funding councils went on to mandate OA anyway.
The UK now has a total of 18 university and funder OA mandates
(including the world's first OA mandate at Southampton's School of
Electronics and Computer Science in 2003).
Australia, however, adopted the world's first university-wide OA
mandate in 2004, and with its current total of 7 mandates along with
this vigorous governmental support from Minister Carr, Australia is
the world's relative, if not absolute leader in OA, by size as well
as timing. And it is about to consolidate that leadership with an
international Open Access and Research Conference in Brisbane next
week, convened by Tom Cochrane, the DVC who engineered the world's
first university OA mandate.
By way of comparison, the US, the country with the world's largest
research output, has only five OA mandates (though that includes one
from the NIH, the world's biggest biomedical research funder, as well
as Faculty mandates from Harvard and Stanford). Universities are the
sleeping giants, and the council of the European Universities
Association (EUA) has unanimously recommended the adoption of an OA
mandate by its 791 member universities in 46 countries -- but that
mandate has not been adopted yet (although Professor Bernard Rentier,
Rector of University of Liege is working on it, withEurOpenScholar).
But Australia looks poised now to be the one that sets all the
dominoes falling worldwide.
Stevan Harnad
American Scientist Open Access Forum
Received on Wed Sep 10 2008 - 19:26:10 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:28 GMT