Stevan Harnad writes
> (Could Tom please state his evidence for this, comparing the 12 mandated
> IRs so far with unmandated control IRs -- as Arthur Sale did for a subset,
> demonstrating the exact opposite of what Tom here claims.)
> http://fcms.its.utas.edu.au/scieng/comp/project.asp?lProjectId=1830
Show me an archive, and a university, who will vouch that for a
certain period, all that is in the IR with free full-text
is a equivalent to the university's authors' total research
papers in the same period. Does such a university exist?
> And the question of the *locus* of mandated deposit still needs to
> be sorted out for the funder mandates: they ought to be mandating IR
> deposit and central harvesting rather than going against the tide by
> needlessly mandating direct central deposit.
> http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/136-guid.html
Central deposit in the funders archive is better because
it assures the funder that a copy is and remains available. It
does not preclude IR archiving.
> (It was my impression that Tom Krichel too was a fan of distributed
> local self-archiving and central harvesting; as I recall, he was one of
> those who warned me off of centralism during my brief fatuous flirtation
> with it.
I remember still you apologizing to me in a public meeting about
this. Surely, few readers of this forum will believe it happened, but
I have witnesses. ;-)
Now you just as infatuated with the idea of in institutional
mandate as a simple solution. You love simple ideas, that
you then keep on repeating.
> But now Tom seems so comfortable with the continuing spontaneous
> deposit rate of economists
Where is your evidence for this? I am not comfortable. For a start,
I am in Siberia at this time. ;-)
> that he does not notice that this spontaneous formula has utterly
> failed to generalize to all other disciplines for well over a decade
> now,
I may be dump, but I am not deluded. I do notice.
The problem is that there are not enough pioneers such as Paul Ginsparg and
Thomas Krichel. And they don't get enough help. It's time for universities
to support academics who are interested to lead forward scholarly
initiative for their groups of scholars. Help them with disk space,
CPU time, open TCP ports etc. In the long run this will generate more
visibility for the sponsoring institution (per money spent) than
pure research.
BTW, I am working in pioneering initiatives (again), if an institution
is interested in sponsorship (in kind not money) get in touch.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
skype: thomaskrichel
Received on Sat Feb 09 2008 - 16:59:59 GMT