Re: Stimulating the Population of European Repositories results out

From: Stevan Harnad <harnad_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 03:53:56 +0000

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Culhane, Mike wrote:

> At my organization, publications lists used for promotion cases are
> generated from the repository. Therefore it's in the author's best
> interest to deposit their publications, and as a result we have close to
> 100% compliance.

Mike,

That's extremely interesting and sensible! Is the policy documented
anywhere, and would you consider registering it in ROARMAP?
http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/sign.php

Stevan



> ____________
> Mike Culhane
> Manager, Library/Internet Services
> Institute for Research in Construction
> National Research Council Canada
> Mike.Culhane -- nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
> http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Repositories discussion list
> Sent: January 23, 2008 9:41 AM
> To: JISC-REPOSITORIES -- JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Stimulating the Population of European Repositories results out
>
> Thank you for posting this information about the need for mandates. But
> I am wondering about the emphasis on mandating deposit. It seems that in
> our enthusiasm for securing a mandate at our institutions we neglect the
> other half of these policies; i.e., how is compliance to be monitored,
> and most importantly, how enforced? It would be useful if other
> institutions with mandates could share their solutions to these issues.
>
> many thanks
> Stephanie
> ____________________________
> Stephanie Meece
> Project Assistant
> Surrey Scholarship Online
> University of Surrey, Guildford
> http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/
>
Received on Sun Jan 27 2008 - 04:00:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:12 GMT