Heather is right. We also encourage our faculty to promote and assist with
archiving of publications from scholarly associations and research networks
they belong to. This enable scholars who are not formally affiliated with a
university and researchers from resource-poor countries to have a place to
archive their publications. It is a good way to use the repository as a
community building tool.
Leslie Chan
On 8/11/06 1:12 PM, "Heather Morrison" <heatherm_at_ELN.BC.CA> wrote:
> There are cases where it makes perfect sense to include articles
> where the author has no affiliation with the institution at all - for
> example, when an archive is hosting papers from a conference hosted
> by the institution, or if a local journal wants to deposit articles
> in the archive.
>
> There are also organizations which are affiliated with many
> universities in a variety of ways, so determining affiliation can be
> trickier than one would think sometimes - plus, there are authors who
> move around, too.
>
> Flexibility is best - better to have more open access than to risk
> losing access due to an inflexible rule.
>
> Heather Morrison
> http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
>
> On 11-Aug-06, at 7:51 AM, Leslie Carr wrote:
>
>> On 11 Aug 2006, at 12:09, Wichor Bramer wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not too keen to include these in our repository. what's your
>>> opinion on
>>> this? Should only articles where al least the first author is
>>> affiliated to
>>> the institution be entered. Where can we draw a line (if we can).
>>> How much
>>> author affiliation does one need?
>>
>> That's a matter of policy, but it would seem to be a strange and
>> arbitrary policy that required a particular percentage of authorship
>> to be allowed in.
>>
>> Many papers (especially in some disciplines) have large author lists:
>> you could inadvertently find yourself discriminating against some
>> departments in your institution.
>> ---
>> Les Carr
Received on Fri Aug 11 2006 - 19:47:13 BST