--- Les Carr On 26 Mar 2005, at 04:09, Stevan Harnad wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Subbiah Arunachalam wrote: > >> Friends: >> >> "Ann Okerson weighs the pros and cons of OA for US research >> libraries, >> noting that institutional repositories are likely to be expensive, >> and >> their focus in the U.S. is likely to be on locally produced >> scholarly >> materials other than articles. Consequently: "It is unlikely that >> under this kind of scenario in the US, scattered local versions of >> STM >> articles would compete effectively with the completeness or the >> value >> that the publishing community adds." She also suggests that library >> cost savings resulting from OA journals are "unlikely, unless >> substantial production cost reductions can be realised by many >> categories of publisher." - in Serials: The Journal for the >> Serials Community 18(1)(2005). >> >> Why does Ann Okerson, a respected and knowledgeable US academic >> librarian, think that institutional repositories will be expensive? >> What >> are the facts? Will leading institutions that have set up >> institutional >> archives tell her and others how much does it cost to set up archives >> and run them. >> >> Arun > > The facts are all contrary to what Ann Okerson states. Not only are > institutional archives not *likely* to be expensive, those that > actually > exist are de facto not expensive at all (a $2000 linux server, > a few days sysad set-up time, and a few days a year maintenance). Their > focus in the US and elsewhere is likely to be exactly on what > university > policy decides it should be (and the Berlin 3 recommendation, likely > to be widely adopted now, is that the focus should be on university > article > output). And the purpose of self-archiving is not and never has been > to "compete effectively with the completeness or the value that the > publishing community adds." It is to provide access to those would-be > users whose institutions cannot afford the journal's official version. > > Stevan Harnad > > > --- Les CarrReceived on Sat Mar 26 2005 - 14:41:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:47:50 GMT