Friends:
It is difficult to believe that learned bodies such as APS and AAI and
the legal luminaries appointed by them could make such dubious arguments,
each one of which has been shown to be utterly untenable by Stevan. I
wonder if this could be a ploy to confuse US legislators with some legal
arguments, even if they cannot stand scrutiny, and delay the process.
Arun
[Subbiah Arunachalam]
--- Stevan Harnad <harnad_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Liblicense-L Listowner wrote:
>
> > See:
> <http://www.the-aps.org/news/nihaccesscomments.htm>
> >
> > This site contains a short, though complex,
> summary of legal issues raised
> > by the NIH proposal. From the legally minded on
> this list, any comments?
> > Ann Okerson/Yale Library
>
> Here is a critique, as ordered:
== [truncated]
Received on Tue Nov 30 2004 - 12:36:12 GMT