Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
How does this follow?
"...the very presence of all that OA content will be the single strongest driver
for preservation."
Brian Simboli
[MODERATOR'S NOTE: In the interest of speed and traffic control,
here is my reply: Because the incentive to preserve contents that
exist is far greater than the incentive to preserve contents that do
not exist. Because as OA moves closer to 100% than to 0%, and daily
expectancy of and reliance on it moves closer to 100% than to 0%,
the concern will be to guarantee that it does not go away. Right
now the concern is getting it to come, not getting it to not go
away. Attention and energy focussed on getting it to not go away are
merely distracting and deterring from efforts to get it to come. In
short: OA Preservation Efforts are grotesquely premature; it is
OA Provision Efforts that are needed today. OA Provision Efforts
alone. Any preservation efforts today should be directed at their
proper targets -- the journals' official proprietary versions of 100%
of published articles -- not at the 10-20% of them that are already
blessed with an author self-archived OA supplementary version -- S.H.]
Received on Mon Oct 04 2004 - 12:12:56 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:47:36 GMT