-- Ed Sponsler Caltech Library System Pasadena, CA USA > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-eprints-underground_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk > [mailto:owner-eprints-underground_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf > Of Christopher Gutteridge > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:12 AM > To: EPrints Underground List > Cc: AmSci Forum > Subject: Re: [EP-underground] Re: Citation is Medium-Independent > > > The intension in the design was that the 'metadata' page > would be used as the URL reference. That way people can see > information on other versions, formats etc. > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 12:54, Stevan Harnad wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Chris Korycinski wrote: > > > > > is there a standard way (or any way) of referencing > material/papers > > > which are on an eprints server? > > > > Yes. For published papers: the standard journal (or book-chapter or > > conference) bibliographic citation, followed by the archive URL. > > > > For unpublished papers: author, title, date, followed by > the archive > > URL. (It is not a good idea to include publication venue > information > > until/unless the preprint has been accepted. One can add "under > > refereeing" or some such, without naming the venue.) > > > > > I would presume that in most cases this reference would be to the > > > full > > > text, but if the deposit is for 'admin staff only' then > you might want to > > > quote the metadata page, which is public, followed by the > paper, which > > > then becomes a 'personal communication' as you have got > it directly > > > from the author & not the eprints server. > > > > > > Chris Korycinski > > > St Andrews eprints administrator, Main Library > > > > The eprint archive is in general not a publication venue > but an access > > venue. Cite documents in it exactly as you would if you > read them on > > paper (e.g., unpublished personal communication, if it is > unpublished) > > and add the archive URL (whether it contains the full-text > or merely > > the metadata). > > > > It is a mistake to treat self-archiving as publication (in the > > "publish-or-perish" sense). It is not. > > http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/#self-archiving-vs-publication > > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm#1.4 > > > > "Citation is Medium-Independent" > > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0362.html > > > > "Self-Archiving vs. Self-Publishing FAQ" > > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0500.html > > > > "Self-Archiving Refereed Research vs. Self-Publishing > Unrefereed Research" > > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/1468.html > > > > "Garfield: 'Acknowledged Self-Archiving is Not Prior > Publication'" > > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2239.html > > > > "Chronicle of Higher Education Article on 'Self-Publication'" > > http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/2375.html > > > > Stevan Harnad > -- > Christopher Gutteridge <cjg_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk> >Received on Wed Jan 28 2004 - 19:55:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:47:19 GMT