Re: Clarification of "parasitism" and copyright

From: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang_at_inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:26:08 +0100

you also have symbions ... and that is even more positive

bernard

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:19:35PM +0000, Stevan Harnad wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Chris Rusbridge wrote:
>
> > Stevan, remember the difference between parasites and epiphytes. Parasites
> > kill their hosts. That does not seem to be quite what you are saying.
>
> Very astute point by Chris! Yes, epiphyte is the apter metaphor:
> Self-archiving will not kill its host but cure it from a maladaptive and
> unsustainable condition, an obsolete Gutenberg legacy. Self-archiving
> will not only provide immediate open access for all, but it will force
> refereed journal publishing to cut inessentials, downsize to the
> essentials, and recover its costs via the natural means for this special
> literature, namely, institutional peer-review costs paid per outgoing
> accepted (or submitted) paper, instead of access-blocking tolls paid
> per incoming journal.
>
> Stevan Harnad

--
         Non aux Brevets Logiciels  -  No to Software Patents
           SIGNEZ    http://petition.eurolinux.org/    SIGN
Bernard.Lang_at_inria.fr             ,_  /\o    \o/    Tel  +33 1 3963 5644
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  Fax  +33 1 3963 5469
            INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
         Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
                 CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX
Received on Thu Feb 07 2002 - 13:29:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:46:23 GMT