On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Bernard Lang wrote:
> I noticed that many people on this list seem genuinely afraid of
> hurting the feelings of publishers. Stevan gave me that impression in
> our latest exchange, to which I stopped replying because I had the
> impression that his eagerness to defend publishers (in the classical
> sense) was hiding facts I did not know about.
No hidden facts. Just one very open one. It is possible to free the
entire refereed journal corpus online (all 20,000+ journals, all
2,000,000+ articles annually), NOW, without asking or waiting for
publishers to do anything at all.
http://cogsci.sootn.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm
Hence I think it is unnecessary and a waste of time and breath to
fulminate against publishers, when there is something much more useful
and effective that we could all be doing instead.
Moreover, peer review is essential; it is what makes the refereed
corpus a REFEREED corpus. Publishers currently implement peer review;
it is an essential service; and there is no reason they should nto
continue doing it, come what may.
So I see absolutely no value in publisher-baiting. It is neither fair
nor useful.
So, no hidden facts. Complete disclosure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stevan Harnad harnad_at_cogsci.soton.ac.uk
Professor of Cognitive Science harnad_at_princeton.edu
Department of Electronics and phone: +44 23-80 592-582
Computer Science fax: +44 23-80 592-865
University of Southampton
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/
Highfield, Southampton
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing free
access to the refereed journal literature online is available at the
American Scientist September Forum (98 & 99 & 00 & 01):
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
You may join the list at the site above.
Discussion can be posted to:
american-scientist-open-access-forum_at_amsci.org
Received on Wed Jan 03 2001 - 19:17:43 GMT