Steven, PubSCIENCE is not an "archive" - it is a collection of bibliographic citations and abstracts, similar to (but much less complete than) already available secondary databases such as INSPEC, Compendex, Web of Science, Chemical Abstracts, etc. PubSCIENCE also lacks the rich classification and indexing of these established databases. PubSCIENCE links to the publisher's web site for access to full text. In my opinion, the demise of PubSCIENCE will have little effect on the scientific community, given that the OJPS (AIP's Online Journal Publishing Service that hosts more than 100 of the leading physics and engineering journals) receives only about 100 link requests from PubSCIENCE each month. (That figure represents less than 0.08% of the average monthly link requests coming into the OJPS.)
Tim Ingoldsby
>>> Stevan Harnad <harnad_at_cogprints.soton.ac.uk> 6/28/01 8:55:36 AM >>>
First, it is not at all clear that this will happen. Second, if it
does, it is not clear that it will have an effect on the centralized
archives in question (e.g. PubScience). Third, even if it should have such
an effect on those centralized archives, a much more powerful
alternative, immune to such legislative whims, is already available:
Distributed, Author/Institution Archiving, all linked into a global
virtual archive through OAI interoperability (
http://www.openarchives.org).
Free open-source software for institutions to create such immune
OAI-interoperable archives is available too:
http://www.eprints.org
So don't despair: prepare, by distributing and interoperating. -- SH
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Declan Butler, Nature wrote:
> Dear Stevan
> This exclusive article...
>
> Budget proposal casts doubt over physics portal's future
>
> A powerful congressional committee has passed a budget bill which, if
> enacted, could close down PubScience, a free search service for the physical
> sciences literature, operated by the US Department of Energy (DoE).
>
> The budget bill, which was passed last week by the House appropriations
> subcommittee for energy and water development and was expected to be
> endorsed by the full appropriations committee, is likely have a chilling
> effect on other government-operated services, including the National Library
> of Medicine's PubMed Central, according to some observers.
>
> ... and an associated leader...
>
> Defending tax-funded navigation
>
> Opinion, Nature
> A congressional committee has erred in its appropriate desire to support
> free enterprise.
>
>
> ...will appear in tomorrow's Nature. I've arranged for them to be made
> available on free access now on
>
> http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/
>
>
> I thought this may be of interest to members of this forum. Please feel free
> to copy this message to others who may be interested in this development.
>
> Cheers
> Declan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stevan Harnad harnad_at_cogsci.soton.ac.uk
Professor of Cognitive Science harnad_at_princeton.edu
Department of Electronics and phone: +44 23-80 592-582
Computer Science fax: +44 23-80 592-865
University of Southampton
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/
Highfield, Southampton
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing free
access to the refereed journal literature online is available at the
American Scientist September Forum (98 & 99 & 00 & 01):
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
You may join the list at the site above.
Discussion can be posted to:
american-scientist-open-access-forum_at_amsci.org
Received on Wed Jan 03 2001 - 19:17:43 GMT