Re: ClinMed NetPrints -- clinmed-2000110006v1

From: Steve Hitchcock <sh94r_at_ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 14:56:09 +0000

At 12:57 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
>ClinMed NetPrints -- clinmed/2000110006v1Dear colleagues, I thought you =
>might find this article of interest. Although it may seem a bit =
>"cloud-headed", my goal was to present a vision to stimulate debate. I =
>would be very grateful if you would post your comments on the vision by =
>clicking on "respond to this article" below right. (You can also reach =
>the article by going to www.bmj.com, clicking on "Netprints", and then =
>searching for my name or browsing by date.) Thanks. Peter Singer

Peter, It's a perfectly good vision, but you are perpetrating an
elaborate hoax and a fraud, on the reader's time. I would urge you to
reposition the sting so that you can make your point just as effectively
but without leaving it to the last line.


Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project <http://opcit.eprints.org/>
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh94r_at_ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
Received on Wed Jan 03 2001 - 19:17:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:45:59 GMT