(10) I don't want to know how a computer does it, I want to know how I do it.
Till further notice, the clearest theory of how anyone or anything does certain kinds of intelligent things is: through computation. So until a better theory comes along, we have no basis for rejecting computation.
There is a version of (10) that is not a granny-objection, and that is that computers can only do little BITS of what we can do. There are many ways to do the little bits, so there's no point taking them seriously. The answer to this is that it's correct, but if/when the models start scaling up toward human capacity (as the Turing Test, which we will discuss soon, dictates), this objection loses its force.